What The Latest Retail Research Tells Us About Turning Information Into Better Decisions
Retail generates more information than ever.
Store audits. Installation reports. Maintenance records. Compliance checks. Completion photography. Store visits. Performance data.
Every interaction with a retail estate creates information. But information on its own doesn’t create insight.
The opportunity is to understand what that information is telling you, why it matters and what should happen next.
Because better retail decisions don’t necessarily come from having more data.
They come from knowing what matters, understanding why and acting on what you learn.
There is an important difference between reporting what happened and understanding what it means.
Data can tell you: What happened?
Insight takes the next step: Why did it happen?
And then: What should we do about it?
That distinction matters in retail, where information is generated across thousands of stores, programmes, displays and customer interactions.
A maintenance report might show an increase in faults. An audit might identify a compliance issue.
Installation photography might reveal inconsistent standards. Performance data might show a decline in a particular location. The information is useful.
But the real value comes from understanding the reason behind it and deciding whether something needs to change.
The challenge isn’t necessarily access to data.
The latest UK Business Data Survey found that 86% of UK businesses handled digitised data in 2025 to 2026.
Yet among businesses that handled digitised data, only 25% said they analyse data to generate new insights or knowledge. That’s a significant difference between having information and using it to create insight.
For retail brands, this raises an important question.
How much information is being collected across the estate that isn’t necessarily making its way into the next decision?
A store visit shouldn’t simply create another report.
A maintenance ticket shouldn’t simply be closed.
An installation shouldn’t simply be signed off.
Each can contribute to a much bigger picture of how a retail estate is performing.
There is another challenge: timing.
Research among 500 UK retail leaders found that 69% only respond to operational issues after they have already affected commercial performance.
The same research found 43% identified delayed decision-making as a barrier to agility, while only 19% said they could respond to pricing, inventory or operational disruption in real time.
The findings point to a wider issue.
Having information isn’t enough if it arrives too late, sits in isolation or doesn’t lead to action.
The opportunity is to identify patterns early enough to understand what is happening and decide what needs to happen next.
The earlier the pattern is understood, the more options there are to respond.
Retail teams now have access to information from an ever-growing number of sources.
Customer data. Store data. Operational data. Performance data. Digital data. Market data.
More information can be valuable. But more information can also create more noise.
The challenge becomes knowing which signals matter, which are connected and which can actually help inform a decision.
This is why the objective shouldn’t be to collect everything. It should be to identify the information that helps answer the question you’re trying to solve.
Start with the decision, not the data.
What are you trying to understand? What decision could the answer influence? What information would help you make it?
A single issue might be an exception. A repeated issue might be telling you something.
The real value of retail data comes from moving beyond what happened to understanding why it’s happening and what you should do differently.
That means looking beyond individual incidents, comparing what is happening across the estate and connecting information that might otherwise sit separately.
A Maintenance Issue
A display has developed a fault. Is it an isolated problem that simply needs fixing?
Or are the same components failing across multiple locations?
If the pattern is repeated, the answer may lie beyond the individual repair. It could point to an issue with the component, specification, installation or ongoing use.
The insight isn’t simply “this display is broken.” It’s “why are these displays failing, and what can we change to prevent it happening again?”
An Installation Issue
One store isn’t meeting the required compliance. Is it a one-off installation issue?
Or are the same inconsistencies appearing across a particular region, store format or programme?
Looking across installation reports, photography and audit results can help distinguish an isolated issue from a wider pattern.
Instead of correcting one store, you may need to review the specification, brief, installation process or quality checks across the programme.
The picture becomes clearer when different sources are considered together.
Individually, each source provides a piece of information. Together, they can reveal something more useful. An issue in one store may require a fix. The same issue appearing across 20 stores may require a different decision.
That’s where estate-level visibility becomes valuable. Not simply because it gives you more information, but because it helps you understand the relationships between individual issues.
A problem tells you where to look. A pattern helps you understand why. Insight tells you what to do next.
AI is changing how retailers collect, process and interpret information.
The UK Business Data Survey found that 41% of businesses handling digitised data reported using AI for at least one purpose in 2025 to 2026, with larger businesses reporting significantly higher adoption.
And the retail research above suggests that AI adoption alone doesn’t guarantee commercial impact.
While 97% of the 500 UK retail leaders surveyed said they had implemented AI in some form, 47% said they were still waiting to see measurable commercial impact.
The lesson isn’t that technology isn’t useful. It’s that technology is only part of the equation.
AI can help identify patterns, process information and surface potential issues.
But teams still need to ask: Is this important? Why is it happening? What should we do about it?
And what will we learn from the outcome?
Technology can accelerate the journey from data to insight. It doesn’t remove the need for judgement.
Collect → Connect → Understand → Decide → Improve
Collect: Capture the information that matters.
Connect: Bring relevant information together rather than viewing each source in isolation.
Understand: Look for patterns, context and the reasons behind what you’re seeing.
Decide: Turn insight into a clear action or change.
Improve: Use what you learn to make the next programme, installation or intervention better.
It’s a simple framework. But it changes the question from: “What data do we have?” to: “What can we learn from it?”
How effectively is your retail estate turning information into action?
Ask yourself:
If the answer is no to several of these, there may be more value in your existing information than you’re currently getting from it.
Better retail decisions don’t come from having more information. They come from asking better questions of the information you already have.
What will you investigate?
What will you change?
What will you do differently next time?
That is where retail insight becomes commercially useful.
At 100% Group, we help brands gain greater visibility across their physical retail estates, connecting information from installation, maintenance, audits, reporting and estate management to create a clearer picture of what’s happening across their retail network.
That helps teams move from information to understanding, and from understanding to action.
Understand what’s happening. Decide what matters. Improve what happens next.
Explore Retail Display Data & Insights →
Explore Retail Display Installation →
Explore Retail Display Maintenance →